{"id":14086,"date":"2026-10-05T09:33:47","date_gmt":"2026-10-05T09:33:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cryptonews.uk.com\/?p=14086"},"modified":"2026-10-05T09:33:47","modified_gmt":"2026-10-05T09:33:47","slug":"circle-and-tether-find-common-ground-against-micas-bank-reserve-rules","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cryptonews.uk.com\/?p=14086","title":{"rendered":"Circle and Tether find common ground against MiCA\u2019s bank reserve rules"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/p>\n

\n

Circle is urging the European Union to open its Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) to foreign-regulated stablecoins and loosen reserve rules that constrain global issuers.<\/p>\n

The USDC issuer proposed a recognition regime that could let qualifying overseas stablecoin companies distribute tokens in Europe without becoming fully authorized EU issuers, as part of a broader push to bring more of the global market inside the bloc\u2019s regulatory perimeter.<\/p>\n

Circle said only three of the world\u2019s 25 largest stablecoins by market value, USDC, USDG and EURC, are currently regulated under MiCA, despite roughly 30 e-money tokens securing authorization since the framework took effect.<\/p>\n

Under its proposal, the European Commission would first determine whether a foreign jurisdiction\u2019s regulatory regime is equivalent to EU standards. The European Banking Authority (EBA) would then recognize individual issuers, which would remain primarily supervised in their home countries while distributing tokens through locally licensed institutions.<\/p>\n

That would create an alternative to current MiCA rules, which generally require e-money token issuers seeking public distribution or trading in the bloc to obtain EU authorization.<\/p>\n

Circle also wants regulators to preserve multi-issuance, where a MiCA-authorized European entity co-issues a globally circulating stablecoin with a foreign-regulated counterpart. The company said restricting that structure risks pushing European users toward offshore platforms and tokens outside MiCA\u2019s protections.<\/p>\n

\"Circle's\"Circle's<\/p>\n

MiCA stablecoin bank reserve rule draws wider opposition<\/h2>\n

Circle is also challenging a requirement that e-money token issuers keep at least 30% of reserves in commercial-bank deposits, rising to 60% for tokens classified as significant. It wants the requirement replaced with a broader liquidity standard, arguing mandatory deposits increase issuers\u2019 exposure to bank credit and counterparty risk.<\/p>\n